When Force Goes Too Far: What Carter v Essex Police Could Mean for Detainee Rights

Huw SouthallPolice Blogs

This blog post examines the Court of Appeal hearing in Carter v Chief Constable of Essex Police, a significant case concerning the interpretation of Section 54(4) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). The case centres on whether custody officers must have objectively reasonable grounds to remove a detainee’s clothing for safety reasons, or whether a subjective belief alone suffices. Mr. Carter, who was forcibly stripped following his arrest in 2017, brought a civil claim for battery. While the County Court sided with him, the High Court overturned that decision—ruling in favour of Essex Police. The Court of Appeal is now tasked with clarifying the threshold required under Section 54(4), with significant implications for detainee rights and police powers in custody settings. Judgment is pending.

Pursuing Personal Injury Claims: Holding Employers Accountable for Negligence in Providing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

In the workplace, ensuring the safety of employees is paramount. However, some employers neglect their responsibilities to provide adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), unnecessarily endangering their workers. This blog explores the rights of claimants in personal injury cases stemming from inadequate PPE provision. From understanding legal obligations to seeking compensation, learn how to hold employers accountable and protect your rights in the event of a workplace injury.

Copyright © HENNAH HAYWOOD LAW 2025